arXiv:quant-ph/0307029v1 4 Jul 2003 Quantization of the stag hunt game and the Nash equilibrilum
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper I quantize the stag hunt game in the framework proposed by Marinatto and Weber which, is introduced to quntize the Battle of the Sexes game and gives a general quntization scheme of various game theories. Then I discuss the Nash equibilium solution in the cases of which starting strategies are taken in both non entangled state and entangled state and uncover the structure of Nash Equilibrium solutions and compare the case of the Battle of the Sexes game. Since the game has 4 parameters in the payoff matrix has rather rich structure than the Battle of the Sexes game with 3-parameters in the payoff matrix, the relations of the magnitude of these payoff values in Nash Equilibriums are much involuved. This structure is uncovered completly and it is found that the best strategy which give the maximal sum of the payoffs of both players strongly depends on the initial quntum state. As the bonus of the formulation the stag hunt game with four parameters we can discuss various types of symmetric games played by two players by using the latter formulation, i.e. Chicken game. As result some common properties are found between them and the stag hunt game. Lastly a little remark is made on Prisoner’s Dillemma. key words: quantization of game theory, stag hunt game, Nash equilibrium, quntum infor
منابع مشابه
Quantum Game Theory Based on the Schmidt Decomposition: Can Entanglement Resolve Dilemmas?
We present a novel formulation of quantum game theory based on the Schmidt decomposition, which has the merit that the entanglement of quantum strategies is manifestly quantified. We apply this formulation to 2-player, 2-strategy symmetric games and obtain a complete set of quantum Nash equilibria. Apart from those available with the maximal entanglement, these quantum Nash equilibria are exten...
متن کاملJump-starting coordination in a stag hunt: Motivation, mechanisms, and their analysis
The stag hunt (or assurance game) is a simple game that has been used as a prototype of a variety of social coordination problems (ranging from the social contract to the adoption of technical standards). Players have the option to either use a superior cooperative strategy whose payoff depends on the other players’ choices or use an inferior strategy whose payoff is independent of what other p...
متن کاملA review on symmetric games: theory, comparison and applications
Game theory models decision makers' behaviors in strategic situations. Since the structures of games are different, behavior and preferences of the players are different in various types of game. This paper reviews various situations of games. Here, characteristics of some common games are discussed and compared. Specifically, we focus on a group of games called symmetric games including Prison...
متن کاملConstructing quantum games from non-factorizable probabilities
A probabilistic framework is developed in which one can analyze both the classical and the quantum games. We suggest exploiting peculiar probabilities involved in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments to construct quantum games. In our framework a game attains classical interpretation when probabilities are factorizable and a quantum game corresponds when probabilities cannot be factori...
متن کاملMetastrategies in the Colored Trails Game
This article investigates the mapping of Colored Trails onto existing games. Two metastrategies are introduced to analyze the game. Based on those metastrategies, a two-player normal form game is derived. Depending on parameter settings, this game can be mapped onto two well-studied games from the field of game theory, i.e. Prisoner’s Dilemma and Stag Hunt. By introducing a third metastrategy, ...
متن کامل